It is happening in the country that prides itself in having a constitution that guarantees freedom of expression.
It is happening in the country that allows citizens to have weapons,
so no one can take their freedoms away.
It is happening in America where the Muslim population is less then 1% of the total.
So it has come to this.. America the land of the free, is unable to defend its citizens from Muslims who object to a make believe Mo bear in a whimsical cartoon strip. In fact, American citizens are unable to defend themselves, armed though they may be.
So what went wrong? What went so decidedly lopsided, that Americans are kowtowing and bowing to Islam, just because one Islamic site put up a threatening article.
America prides itself as having the world most powerful military, and yet we have Gen Petraus making excuses why his forces cant win against a ragtag bunch of bandits in Afghanistan. He blames Israel for building homes in its capital city for his failure.
Whats gone wrong?
At the time of Salman Rushdie affair, I knew then that it would come to this. The only hope I see at the moment is France – you know the cheese eating surrender monkeys (Muslim population 10%). They intend to ban the burqa not just in schools but in all public places. Lets hope they don’t back down because of pressure from their Muslim residents, or their allies. Denmark is also doing something similar.
Let us hope that the great Anglo democracies – politicians in the UK and the USA, at the very least, do not let them down.]]>
To this end, Western thinkers have come up with the idea of the existence “moderate” Muslims and “radical” Muslims. Though such a dichotomy has never existed in the history of Islam, and that Muslims all over the world totally condemn such a breach in Islam, the West continues with this division, as it is the only one that allows it NOT to face facts.
The distinction between moderate Muslims and radical Muslims is meaningless, for the simple reason that the larger the number of Muslims, moderate or radical, the greater will be the demands for sharia. If these are not granted, then threats of violence follow.
What funds and generates the Jihad is the total number of Muslims. Radical or moderate is meaningless. What will stop the Jihad is the complete separation from Islam.
There is no doubt that for for thew good of all, including Muslims, Islam has to be separated from Europe, and the West. If this is not done, then even if Muslims are not a majority, we will continue to have carBQs, rape of western kuffar women, major security and terror related issues, as well riots and threats of murder whenever Muslims feel their religion or prophet have been insulted. Freedom of speech then dies, and eventually freedom of thought as well.
Look at the chaos Muslims have created even when their population is no larger then 3% of the total. Then imagine what will happen when they are 10% or 20%.
This cannot carry on. For every one’s good, the West and islam have to be separated before a civil war ensues. The last is no good at all.]]>
I will drop the coyness, and state outright that all this fuss is because of Islam and Muslims, though the governments, the EU and the UN, are trying to pretend that it is common to all religions and faiths. No one ever bothered about these matters until Muslim immigrants took offence at our freedom to be rude about any religion, and most particularly about Islam and its founder Mohammed.
And what if the so-called “blasphemy” was not really blasphemy but actually the truth about a religion? Did Mohammed have sex with a child, and does that make him paedophile? Legitimate comment or blasphemy? Mohammed raided caravans for profit – does that make Mohammed a brigand – legitimate comment or blasphemy? Do the above two facts destroy all claims of Mohammed being a genuine prophet, in the truest meaning of the word. Blasphemy or legitimate comment? And so on. Muslims are bombing and shooting their way across the whole world, while shouting “allahu ackbar”. So would depicting Mohammed with a bomb under his turban be a justifiable caricature of Islam or blasphemy?
I can understand that we should be well mannered, as well as mindful of our own necks, and not say anything negative about Islam in a Muslim country. But I fail to see why Muslim immigrants, who are here at our sufferance, should dictate with threats of violence, what we can say, read or write. They knew full well before they came here, that we had freedoms for which we went through two world wars, and were unlikely to give them up just to please Muslims. For be certain, this is not just about speech, but will extend to what we can write, and thus what we can read. And who will decide – of course the EU apparatchiks.]]>